The World Bank’s unwavering commitment to sanctioning fraudulent practices

KNOWLEDGE | The World Bank's unwavering commitment to sanctioning fraudulent practices and implementing compliance and integrity tools serves as a shining example for promoting a global culture of transparency and ethical conduct.

*Article only written in English

The World Bank’s commitment to combating fraudulent practices extends beyond its debarment process. The bank has implemented a range of measures to strengthen transparency, accountability, and integrity in its operations. For example, the bank has established the Office of Suspension and Debarment[1], which is responsible for investigating allegations of fraud and misconduct and imposing sanctions where necessary. The bank has also launched initiatives such as the Integrity Vice Presidency[2], which works to prevent, detect, and investigate fraud and corruption in bank-funded projects.

In addition to these internal measures, the World Bank collaborates with other stakeholders to promote transparency and accountability in the public sector. The bank is a founding member of the International Corruption Hunters Alliance[3], a network of law enforcement agencies, anti-corruption organizations, and international financial institutions that work together to combat corruption. The bank also participates in initiatives such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative[4], which aims to increase transparency and accountability in the extractive industries.

Despite these efforts, fraudulent practices remain a significant challenge for multilateral development banks. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated this challenge, with reports of corruption and fraud in emergency procurement processes for COVID-19-related supplies and services[5]. In response, the World Bank and other multilateral development banks have increased their efforts to prevent and detect fraud in COVID-19 response projects.

For example, the World Bank has established a COVID-19 Emergency Response Integrity Fund[6], which provides funding to support anti-corruption measures in COVID-19 response projects. The fund also supports the bank’s efforts to investigate allegations of fraud and corruption in COVID-19 response projects. These efforts have been followed by other multilateral, such as the African Development Bank, which has launched a COVID-19 Response Facility[7], that includes measures to prevent and detect fraud and corruption in COVID-19 response projects.

Initiatives like the ones mentioned above generate good results. The World Bank’s recent debarments highlight that no malpractice is too small to be identified and punished. In a December 2022 case, a consultant and his affiliated companies[8] were debarred for 18 months for misrepresenting project output verification reports in a small project in Vanuatu[9]. The World Bank’s press release[10] stated that this constitutes fraudulent practice under the bank’s procurement guidelines (World Bank’s 2011 Guidelines for Selection and Employment of Consultants under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits & Grants.)[11],[12]

Similarly, the World Bank more recently debarred Burhani Engineers Ltd. and its three affiliates for fraudulent practices related to a project in Uganda. Burhani misrepresented its prior experience to obtain contracts under the project. As part of the settlement, the company acknowledged culpability and agreed to meet specified integrity compliance conditions, in line with the World Bank Group Integrity Compliance Guidelines[13], for release from debarment.

The bank also provides a lot of transparency on who and why got sanction. It maintains a list of all debarred entities[14] and individuals, currently numbering 1,210[15]. China, with 14% of the cases, appears most frequently on the list, followed by India, Vietnam, Nigeria, and the United Kingdom, with 3,5% of all cases[16].

Overall, the World Bank’s debarment process and other anti-fraud measures demonstrate the bank’s commitment to upholding ethical standards in its operations. However, the bank recognizes that combating fraudulent practices requires ongoing efforts and collaboration with other stakeholders. By working together, multilateral development banks, governments, and civil society organizations can promote transparency and accountability and ensure that development resources are used effectively and efficiently.


ESG Update: The World Bank is currently conducting a review of its debarment system, which may be expanded to include not only fraudulent conduct, but also environmental misconduct and anticompetitive practices. The potential impact of these types of misconducts can be significant, and the bank recognizes the need for a more comprehensive approach[17]. As noted by the United Nations Global Compact[18], environmental and social governance (ESG) issues can have a major impact on a company’s reputation and financial performance, making it essential for organizations to prioritize responsible practices in all areas of their operations.





[5][5] See interesting literature about that here:



[8] The consultant and his controlled affiliates will be ineligible to participate in projects and operations financed by the World Bank Group during the 18 months debarment period.

[9] $4.7 million World Bank-funded Project designed to scale up access to electricity services for rural households, aid posts, and community halls located in dispersed off-grid areas. Vanuatu is an island nation in the South Pacific with a population of around 300,000.

[10] See


[12] Through investigations, the Integrity Vice Presidency (INT) ascertains whether firms and/or individuals have engaged in one of the World Bank Group’s five sanctionable practices, as described in the Guidelines.


[14] See

[15] Downloaded on: 13/12/2022 17:18.

[16] It’s worth noting that debarment from the World Bank qualifies for cross-debarment by other multilateral development banks, including the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, and the African Development Bank.



NOTE: This publication was written for general information and educational purposes only and may therefore contain errors and is not intended, under any circumstances, to be specific advice, legal or otherwise. Neither CONEXIG nor its directors, shareholders, legal representatives, managers and/or employees will be responsible under any circumstances for the statements, comments or opinions expressed in this publication, the author of this being solely responsible. We disclaim any representation and/or warranty regarding the accuracy, timeliness, quality, or applicability of any of the content presented here. Readers of this publication should not act or fail to act in reliance on it, and we disclaim all liability in respect of such acts or omissions. This publication is not a substitute for competent legal advice on the issues dealt with, directly or indirectly, in it. The content of this document may be updated or changed without prior notice.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *